jump to navigation

SBP Confirms FF facing armageddon. October 24, 2010

Posted by Scandalcentral in Current Affairs, Politics.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

Tonight’s Red C poll commissioned on behalf of the Sunday Business Post has confirmed every Fianna Fáil TD’s worst nightmare- whitewash. The poll placed the republicans on just 18%, the lowest percentage ever recorded on a Red C poll. The poll leaves the party shattered and in serious trouble. If the party received support levels like these in a General Election, it would leave the party with only about 30 seats. That would be a loss of about 40 seats and with very little TD’s left in Dublin.

Fine Gael top’s the poll at 32%, up 1% since last month. The party will be pleased that it is regaining support and momentum after a challenging Summer. If the party received this level of support in a General Election, it would result in the party returning to the Dáil with at least 60 seats. Fine Gael would be the largest party with Enda Kenny as Taoiseach. This poll more or less saves Enda Kenny’s career. For pressure has been mounting in recent weeks and it was highly speculated that if this poll failed to impress it would end Kenny’s time as leader of the most popular party in Ireland. However to be fair to Kenny, I do believe he is underrated. There is no doubt he will bring honesty and integrity back to Irish politics. There is also little doubt, that he is aware of how serious a crisis we are in. He is also ready for election “ The coming months will be the most exciting time in Irish politics in my lifetime. It will be a time for truth,for honour, and above all, for courage.” Fine Gael and Enda Kenny must now build on this percentage and continue to offer an alternative to the current Government.

Labour find them selves on 27%. This percentage will be decisive, for unless Labour push above 30%, they will struggle to win the second seats where they wish to do so. Nevertheless, they will be relatively pleased with this poll. However, the breakdown of Labour’s vote, shows that they have the greatest undecided voter who may potentially swing anywhere. This must be a worry for the policy-less party who may struggle to keep these voters if a General Election was upon us. If Labour did manage 27%, it would leave them with about 50 seats.

As expected, this poll suggested that Sinn Féin will win a seat in both Donegal Constituencies but will struggle elsewhere. The poll placed them on 9% nationally. However in Donegal South- West, where a Bye-Election is looming, it placed them on 31.8%, ahead of Fine Gael on 31.1%. Fianna Fáil were on 25.3%, well down on 2007 figures which returned Mary Coughlan and Pat Gallagher to the 30th Dáil. Labour were on just 8.6% and will not win a seat.

Overall, it leaves Fianna Fáil truly in crisis, with Brian Cowen facing into what will be the worst election the party has ever faced. Perhaps, he should call a snap election to stop the party sliding any further. For, how far more can Fianna Fáil fall?

Labour selects candidates for DSE May 25, 2010

Posted by Scandalcentral in Current Affairs, Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

Kevin Humphries: DSE Candidate

The Labour party has selected its candidates for Dublin South East for the Next General Election. The Big news is that Ivana Bacik has lost out. Yes, everyone can breathe a sigh of relief! Labour have selected TD Ruairi Quinn along with Councillor Kevin Humphreys to stand for the election. Humphreys is regarded as having a large local support base and is expected to do well alongside Quinn. This will be a key constituency for Labour if they are to do well at the next election. It appears that the Labour party are targeting the seat of either Chris Andrews of Fianna Fail or Green leader John Gormley. One would have to assume that Andrews would be a more attainable target.

oisin_quinn_15

Oisin Quinn: Watch this space?

At the last local election in 2009 Humphreys had 700 votes to spare, topped the poll with 2598 votes and brought in a running mate. This helped Labour to win two seats for the first time ever in the South East Inner City area. This proves he has a support base and most definitely deserves the nomination ahead of Ivana Bacik, who just can’t decide what constituency she represents. It also appears to work out well for Ruairi Quinn who has Oisin, his nephew, (Currently Councillor) ready to take his seat in a few years.

Lucinda Creighton: Ability to bring in a running mate?

Nevertheless this will still be a huge task for Labour. They are trying to increase their vote from 16.7% and hoping to take a sizeable chunk of out Fianna Fail’s 28.7% at the last election. Is it logically possible for Labour to win 2 out of 4 seats? Another big name in this constituency includes Lucinda Creighton (Soon to be Bradfield?) Personally I think her seat is very safe. She herself appears quietly confident of  a second seat for Fine Gael, hence someone will lose out here. Eoghan Murphy is rumoured to be her running mate, a current Councillor for Pembroke- Rathmines. Therefore unlike Labour, youth is on the side of Fine Gael, something which is very important to a Dublin voter. Like 2007 where we had a high profile loss in Micheal McDowell, then leader of the PD’s, I’m expecting another political casualty here. Can either FG or LB will a second seat? I don’t think its beyond impossibility. More importantly if they do, one big name falls from grace. Place your bets, Andrews or Gormley?

Reference Links: http://www.politics.ie/labour/130290-ruairi-quinn-kevin-humphreys-selected-run-dse-sen-ivana-bacik-loses-out.html http://www.labour.ie/kevinhumphreys/

Desperation sets in for Labour. May 6, 2010

Posted by Scandalcentral in Current Affairs.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
2 comments

The Labour party’s new-found policy of picking up any political dimwit’s with a “profile” continues with the addition of independent Councillor Jimmy Harte in Donegal. Donegal has been a barren place for the Labour party and the left over the years. At the last general election Labour got 2.79% in Donegal South West (Home to Calamity Coughlan) and a meager 1.82% in Donegal North East. One has to ask if the addition of someone like Harte will make any major difference to these numbers in Donegal North East? Harte himself was a Fine Gael town Councillor for many years after his father, an Ex-Fine Gael Minister retired from politics in the late 1990′s. He later switched to an Independent before the 2007 general election after Fine Gael refused to allow him to run alongside Joe McHugh. The ironic thing for the Labour party with that is that Harte himself as an independent did better than Labour itself! Harte got 3.41% of the vote that time out finishing 6th in a 3 seater. Do Labour really think they have a chance of winning a seat? I doubt it, however Gilmore has pledged that he will run candidates in every constituency. He probably should have added to that, that these “candidates” will have a Labour flag but no proof that they have signed on for all that is Labour and its left-wing ideology.

Let us take Mae Sexton. I personally have huge issue with her “joining” Labour. Logically how can someone for about 10 years follow the PD right-wing  ideology, built upon liberal economics with comparatively liberal social policies and then suddenly change to Labour? The left identifies a strong degree of state economic control, which may also be accompanied by liberal and authoritarian social policies. Basically the total opposite. Does Mae Sexton really now believe in the welfare state and is now also passionately opposed to unfettered market forces? Has she been on the road to Damascus over the past 2 and a bit years? Has she also converted religion and cereal?  For someone to change social and economic views so radically is not plausible. Had Mae any other options? Well sadly she didnt. Joining Fianna Fail isnt going to get her a Dáil seat. Fine Gael are ready for the election in Longford Westmeath with James Bannon and Senator Nicky McFadden  along with possibly Peter Burke if they run with a 3 candidate ticket. Meaning Mae realistically would have to stand alone or stand to the left. Does she has a chance of getting elected? Sadly the answer once again for Gilmore is no. Willie Penrose had 0.88 of a quota at the last election, Sexton herself under the PD umbrella had 4.18% of the vote or 0.19 of a quota. Essentially basically mathematics will tell you the chances of a second seat are very very slim. So why run at all? Im sure Mae will try her best and if Labour are in the next Government well watch out for that Seanad Éireann nomination.

But what is politics without ideology and beliefs? Im my view Gilmore has brought politics down to its lowest level of crony-ism possible. The irony! The man who criticizes Fianna Fail crony-ism day after day in the Dáil doesnt practice what he preaches. Is Gilmore actually examining his own policy? I would argue this may do long-term damage to Labour, showing that they are desperate for power and will pick up anyone, with any ideology along the way.

So Gerry Crowley, Mae Sexton, Jimmy Harte, that famous person in Clare we keep hearing about and who’s next I ask? Che Guevara? Some relative of Maggie Thatcher or George Bush? I wouldnt rule it out..right is the new left I hear ;)

Links:

http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/0506/labour.html

http://www.tribune.ie/article/2010/jan/31/fine-gael-sinn-fein-champing-at-bit-for-donegal-po/

3rd level: Who’s going to fund it? April 19, 2010

Posted by Scandalcentral in Current Affairs, FG, Student Affair's, Topical.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Last weekend we saw the Labour conference, in which they brought 3rd level educational funding back on everyone’s minds. This is a hugely contentious issue for students and the industry at whole which is in a position of limbo at present.

Ruairí Quinn: “Fianna Fail wants to bring back undergraduate fees which Labour successfully abolished in 1995. We will not let that happen. The campaign of Labour Youth and the Union of Students in Ireland has been successful.”

Labour continue to plough on with the same policy they implemented in 1995. A policy which is in many respects not a policy at all. What I mean by this is that it has resulted in a massive underfunding of third level education. It has led to a scenario where the Government is almost expected to fully fund our 3rd level sector. This is the same Government which hasn’t two brass shillings to rub together and wont have for some time to come.

Over the weekend, Labour expressed the idea that the Government would under Labour continue to pick up the bill for 3rd level even suggesting they will increase it to fill the black hole in many of our universities.

” ..Increasing financial resources for third level education is an investment in all our futures, in our young people and in our economy.”

Once again the question must be asked as to where will this money come from? For if it will come from the exchequer, what will be cut instead to make room for this extra expenditure? Ruairí Quinn, naturally (and somewhat typical of Labour), failed to outline his budgetary plans on this. (In 2008 the Government paid € 1356 million to 3rd level institutions due to the current free fees policy. This is separate to the other funding given such as capital expenditure etc.)

Quinn did mention the idea unveiled by Fine Gael several weeks ago, about increasing the numbers of foreign students studying in this state to increase revenues. While this will increase income,  a few points must be noted. Firstly, will university places increase to meet this new demand? If so, would this not increase costs? Hence a portion of this income would not be ‘profit’ for the industry. Secondly and conversely, if places are not increased this will result in probably less Irish students getting into 3rd level. This would be the students with the poorest academic results, which in a large proportion of cases is unfortunately Fchildrethose from low socio-economic backgrounds. Hence does this in itself not clash with the policy of free fees, which was to get rid of  the ” barrier between third level education and those very students that we need to go to college.”

The question of funding therefore is not answered by this Labour plan, at least not in my mind. I also have some ideological issues with the current system. Over the last 15 years the richest in this state have got their nearest and dearest through 3rd level without paying anymore than the poorest or middle class in this society. Is that actually fair? Should a father, with an income of one million a year, not pay something to his child’s 3rd level education? More importantly, why should he get it for free? The state doesn’t give these people medical cards, so why should we give them a free ride through 3rd level? There are many in this country who are well able to pay for their children’s 3rd level education (and many who are willing!) and who already in many cases pay fees at second level. Yet this state, during one of worst fiscal crises we have ever witnessed, doesn’t require them to pay their way? Personally, I’m repulsed by this very fact.  I believe, as do many Irish people I’m sure, that these people should pay. Now, don’t get me wrong, those from disadvantaged backgrounds etc should still and always be entitled to free 3rd level education. But the current situation and the situation which Labour wants to continue is ridiculous.

Many are aware that U.C.C recently introduced a conferring charge on students. This is an example of the failing of the current system. The Government clearly can’t afford to keep footing the bill, so they have shown the Universities the two fingers and told them to deal with it. U.C.C has decided to balance the books by charging the students. Do you really blame them, for how else would they easily get a couple hundred thousand? But once again, is this fair? However is it fair that students who were told the €1650 registration and capitation fee at the beginning of the year was it and then for U.C.C to turn around and give another bill to graduating students? U.C.C Young Fine Gael society along with the Student Union made a fuss about this which appears to have led to them rethinking the figure. The whole reality of the situation is that as long as the 3rd level system is underfunded, the students will be picking up the tab. This fee, along with U.C.C’s printing fees and other miscellaneous charges, must be paid by all students and students of all socio-economic backgrounds. Hence these famous financial barriers to education have not really been removed. Many of the other barriers have never been addressed properly. Namely, how to get those from disadvantaged area’s into 3rd level. We have had 15 years of “no fees” and yet the numbers entering 3rd level from certain parts of this state has no changed substantially at all. In many cases academic performance at 2nd level is a major issue. In many other cases, students have dropped out before their Leaving Certificate, meaning access for them is not a major uphill battle. Yet where is the headline grabbing by the political parties trying to solve this problem?

The Fine Gael “3rd way” document does deserve a mention as when one examines the future direction of 3rd level education, we should look at all opposition perspectives to be fair. The document claims that while 3rd level funding has increased over the last 10 years, it has not increased fast enough to keep pace with the explosion in numbers at 3rd level. The document contains so very needed idea’s including that college’s should be more transparent with its accounts so the taxpayer funding them know’s where their money is being spent. It also (Rightly) challenges 3rd level institutes to interact more with industry to find out what kind of graduates we need and in what area’s. As being fair, the state is spurning out thousands of art’s and humanities graduate’s- without a massive need and failing to fill the gap in the science and engineering area. But the key issue I’m interested in is the access one. It does address it. The document outlines how the grant for the poorest should be increased and how those students should be monitored to see if it’s really enough. It also proposes a huge expansion of the HEAR programme which allows those from poorer backgrounds enter 3rd level even if they don’t have the points but have the ability for the particular course. It also deals with issues at primary and second level for these students. The document also deals with funding. It outlines how it will abolish the registration fee. It maintains that the majority of funding will still come from the exchequer. The students will not have fees during college nor will they have the loan system, instead they will be required to pay a higher rate of PRSI for a number of years after graduation. The document claims this will raise 500 million a year. In many respects this is a positive idea. For up to now political parties have almost refused to even acknowledge the funding question. It raises some very important points about the flexibility of the payment of this and the fact that a student is paying just 30% of the total cost of the degree rather than all. Overall this is positive.

“Free fees” may get some college votes in an election, but it doesn’t address the chronic underfunding at 3rd level. It doesn’t address the access problem that still exists.  It doesn’t provide a real, viable solution to a hugely important issue. I can only hope that the funding system for 3rd level is properly examined soon.

Reference links:

Third Way Document- Fine Gael:

http://www.finegael.org/upload/file/3rdway.pdf

Ruairí Quinn- Labour:

http://www.labour.ie/press/listing/12715003352941873.html

Note: I acknowledge not all political parties policies in this area were discussed here. I hope to deal with them in the future.

Labour Conference: Anything New? April 18, 2010

Posted by Scandalcentral in Current Affairs, FG, Topical.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
6 comments

The Labour Party conference was held this weekend in Galway, at what has to have been the lowest media coverage I have ever heard. On the radio yesterday, several stations ignored it. At the time I wondered why.  After re-examining several of the speeches, I think I understand.

Very little new policy has come to light this weekend for the Labour Party. This has to be viewed as disappointing, particularly when I personally wouldn’t know what left-ist policies are in the first place, as I’m sure is the case for many of the swing voters in this country.

Gilmore talked about him being Taoiseach.  A mantra which dies on many ears. The likelihood of that happening is tiny to say the least. Personally, I believe, many voters would respect him a lot more if he was honest and realistic to the Irish people. The real burning question I want answered, is how Labour plans to be in the next Government. Right now, the prospects are somewhat blurry. Since 2007 Fine Gael and Labour have moved in totally opposite directions. Fine Gael has moved more to the right and Labour appears to have moved more to the left. Even after the next election, say Fine Gael need a further 10-15 seats to make a Government, will Labour be the 1st phone call? Rumour’s have it that Amhrán Nua and The Liberals plan to run  candidates in the next election. If several of these right-ist politicians get elected along with for example several of the usual independents, then suddenly Labour is not possibly the best option any longer. In relation to the Labour and Fianna Fail option, well I believe, this is looking like a great possibility. AS the economy recovers over the next 12-18 months (Coinciding with the next General Election) Fianna Fail will recover some percent in the Poll’s reducing the loss of seats. After the next election FF and Labour may be a very workable ideology for many people.

So what did Labour say this weekend, that should be debated? Liz McManus talked about allowing Labour into the final RTÉ debate before the next election- a debate for future leaders, either Cowen or Kenny, hence this is purely ridiculous.  A further personal loss in respect for the Red Rose. Several delegates mentioned about how the banks have been bailed out and of course how the Irish people haven’t..etc etc..Blah, blah! Nothing NEW!!! Are the Irish people really to believe that Eamonn Gilmore would actually start dipping into the NPRF to create jobs, refund teachers for their salary losses or help homeowners who cant pay their mortgage? Absolutely not. If that was to be done, the financial markets would punish Ireland for pure insanity, using the pension investment fund to finance current spending? That economic treason quote may come back to haunt Gilmore very soon…

Education is once again top of the Labour agenda. Along with fellow opposition bashing:

“Councillor Aodhán Ó Riordáin told members that the only thing more frightening than Mary Coughlan as Minister for Education, was the prospect of a Fine Gael minister holding the portfolio.”

I’m sure Brain Hayes may refute that claim  greatly. All this commentator will say to that, is at least Fine Gael have proper plans in place on how to actually finance 3rd level education. Since 1997 the sector has been greatly under financed due to an infectious Labour policy which has cost this country millions. The rich and famous can now get their children through 3rd level education whichout paying a cent in actual fee’s. We dont give these people medical cards (Perhaps this will be the next Labour policy to foul this good state) so why should they get off the fee’s they can well afford to pay? Fine Gael has solid, costed policies on how to actually fund 3rd level. The Labour claim that the state can do this, has clearly been shown to be totally false. Last weeks UCC conferring fee is testament to that. (Along with its 13 million euro debt)

Joan ‘Battleaxe’ Burton claimed this weekend that the Government “has got everything wrong” in relation to the economy. This is the same party who voted against the Bank Guarantee scheme last September when the country was told that we were hours away from the collapse of the banking system. What exactly would Labour have done then? Anyone voting for Labour won’t be doing it if they have an economic conscience. The Burton ‘Battleaxe’ would single-handily destroy this country. I’ll take a Fianna Fail Finance minister before I’d let Labour get their Left paws on it. Labour have also vowed to oppose domestic water charges, hardly something on top of everyone’s agenda.

Labour also will help 30,000 new apprentices get qualified. Re-read that sentence everyone. Apprentices, means plumbers, block-layers, electricians etc. Thousands of whom are qualified and on the DOLE! Why should the state finance the training of another 30,000? Labours credibility should be throughly damaged by Gilmore’s rhetoric this weekend. His speech contained no idea on how to actually fund his plans. It contained no new amazing policies that will really change Ireland for the better. Labour claim to be the party that will help especially the lower class. Yet every time they have been in Government they have failed to really implement any policies which have actually helped improve the situation.

One very worrying side note to his speech was quoting Karl Marx

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need”

To think that Gilmore is flirting with the extreme Left at a time of economic peril for the state is very frightening.

This conference has reinforced what many of us already knew. That Labour can’t be trusted in key portfolio’s and that Gilmore is nothing more than a sound-bite politician. The real question is- when will the Irish people realise this?

Gormley Defends GP in Government…How? March 27, 2010

Posted by Scandalcentral in Current Affairs, Topical.
Tags: , , , , , ,
2 comments

http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/0327/greens.html

RTÉ.ie News: John Gormley Defended party's record

It appears that John Gormley has used his prime time 30 minute slot this year to defend the Green’s in Government instead of announcing policy or anything of real value to a swing voter. This in its self is fine, as long as there is something to defend!

Without a shadow of a doubt the Green Party has failed miserably in Government, not due to the recession, but down to their lack of action in keeping Fianna Fáil “in line” along with the fact that they HAVEN’T achieved enough (Or any) of their “Green” goals.

http://www.greenparty.ie/en/about/party_archives/election_2007/manifesto_2007

The above link will lead one to the Green Party manifesto before the 2007 election. I will not mention anything to do with the economic elements because they were based on predicted figures at the time and more importantly, no one votes for the Green’s if they care about the economy anyway.

Here are some examples….

Road Safety: Reduce the blood alcohol limit to 50mg/100ml”

Broadband: Set the mobile phone operators, cable companies and Eircom into direct competition to get cheaper, faster and more integrated broadband services”

Political Reform: Reduce the number of TDs from 166 to 130 and more than double Dáil sitting time.

Roads: The Green Party will: respect existing road contracts but, where there is concern about potential damage to communities, environment or heritage, will investigate how this can be minimised within the scope of the contract or through renegotiation” (RE: Proposed motorway through Tara, heritage site)

“Rail: build a light rail line running from Mahon to Ballincollig via Cork City Centre” (Was that a joke?)

Communications: consolidate post offices into local community internet/broadband facilities”

Students: abolish the student travel card, which represents a form of double taxation on students, and replace it with a free student ID card which will entitle students to the same level of discounts.” (Pity about this one :( )

Air Travel: The Green Party will:

• develop new routes from Cork, Shannon and Belfast and provide proper public transport links to these airports, rather than construct a second terminal in Dublin;

• phase out the subsidy to internal flights;

• support proposals from the French government to put an EU-wide tax on aviation fuel.” ( Dublin now has its new terminal, the tax idea ,dear GOD- lets destroy Irish tourism!)

3rd Level Education: provide a €110 million of support loans and grants for part-time and full-time students.” (The grant has been cut for 2010/11)

Voting: overhaul the archaic voter registration system, possibly linking it to PPS Numbers”

All of the above come straight from the Green’s themselves. All of the above are examples of Green Party failings. There are many more may I add! The Green Party in Government has failed to achieve anything worth talking about. Tonight, Gormley declared We are in politics to get things done” in his keynote speech- well you could have fooled me! The above examples show how little the Greens have actually got done. For many their stint in Government proves that they are still the same Green Party that existed 10 years ago. The Greens have been a spectacular failure in Government, right now they must wonder what % they would have in the polls if they hadn’t gone into government. Tomorrows papers place them on 5% http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/0327/poll.html That puts them on course to lose seats at the next election.Near the last election the party was on 8%, for a small party 3% is more or less oblivion.

http://www.redcresearch.ie/documents/SBP20thMay07PollReport.pdf

In tonight’s speech, Trevor Sargeant was also mentioned.  We were told it was No excuses, no delays just decisive action.” Sargeant knew about what he had done for ages and didn’t stand down until it came into the media spotlight. How can one call that no delays?

Then of course came the key message of the speech in relation to planning:

“The Labour Party councillors have behaved, for the most part, responsibly – but not so Fine Gael councillors. Fine Gael is still receiving contributions from the developers, still rezoning, and still has not woken up to the new reality.”

Being totally honest, never in my life have I heard such an unfounded comment. I know many Fine Gael Councillors and none of whom would dare accept a bribe or otherwise vis a vis planning. That era belongs in the 1970′s Ireland and for Gormley to claim that on live television in front of thousands I find startling. I’m also very confident that for the Labour Councillors it’s the same case- hence Gormley has made a lot of enemies tonight right across the country.

One notable part of the Green Party manifesto that it appears will be implemented is here: “ban blood sports with heavy penalties for organisers of, and participants in, illegal blood sports” Gormley had the following to say to the 5000 protestors who came to tell him that Rural Ireland has had enough of a man who has no idea what coursing is about  your actions serve only to make us more determined than ever to make the changes that are needed.”- a pitiful response to the thousands who have been involved in this sport for centuries.

This weekend the Green Party conference has assured the swing voter of one thing, the Greens are failures and have not helped the country in any fundamental way. John Gormley’s speech was filled with sound bites but little hardcore revolutionary policy.The comment at 5.55 in this video is very fitting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vtk8yOX46Pw john gormley


What is sexism? March 14, 2010

Posted by Scandalcentral in Topical.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

So here we are. The point when eventually one political party proposes to provide a quota to allow more women to join political life. It has been coming for a long time. When one listens to people like Ivana Bacik day in day out eventually some one will listen. Fine Gael this weekend tried to introduce a rule into the party’s constitution requiring a minimum amount of candidates to stand in an election. (For example 20% must be female.) The idea behind this is to increase the amount of females in politics.

The Fine Gael party has rejected this- and rightly so. Lucinda Creighton was one of the main apparent opposer’s of the idea. Today I read that John Waters agreed with her view. I also agree! Let us remember that if we place a quota on females, it is actually discriminating against males. (Think about that one) The “Crazy” feminists never stop to think of that fact. Its said the reason there “is always” a female poet on the leaving cert English paper is to represent women. For if it wasn’t there it would be discrimination. However equally by having it there is also a form of discrimination.

There is no doubt in today’s world that women are equal to males. Yes, there’s more males in the Dáil. It’s clear why! Why would any woman want to spend 3 days in Dublin away from her family? Why would she want to spend the rest of week travelling around the constituency? Why would she want to lose out not only on family time, but personal time?

Senator Ivana Bacik

Women have an equal opportunity to get into the Dáil as males do. They simply are choosing a life away from politics. Nevertheless, look at who we have! Lucinda Creighton, Olwyn Enright and Deirdre Clune etc, all excellent politicians. No one is stopping women from joining politics they have the choice to enter if they please. Recently George Lee told a group in UCC, that he couldn’t understand why any woman would want to enter the political world.

Clearly this must return to the question of what is sexism? If we were to create a law meaning a certain amount of women must enter politics then suddenly by default we have created a law meaning there is a maximum amount of men which can enter politics. What will follow this….once we go down that route where will it stop? Next we will have a minimum amount of homosexuals or “young people” that must be in the Dáil. Then a minimum amount  of transsexuals, bisexuals, immigrants, Jews, Muslims, Catholics, disabled…the list goes on and on. Thank God we have people like Lucinda Creighton in the Dáil, for without her, all the arguments would be left to someone like Ivana and co.

What a week? February 20, 2010

Posted by Scandalcentral in Current Affairs, Politics, Topical.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

So, another week in politics down. With out doubt, there is no other small western country that has as many scandals that has rocked Leinster House over the last 14 days. One had just adjusted to life post-Lee and De Burca and then this..

“Dea-gate” will surely have to go down as one of the most idiot scandals to ever hit Irish politics. The fact  the Mr O’Dea did what he did at all, to me seams baffling. Common sense would tell anyone that Sinn Féin were never going to trouble the regular poll topper in Limerick. So why did he do what he did? What demon possessed him? These questions will possibly never be answered. Whatever the actual motivation behind O’Dea’s actions- its clear, he has paid the price.

Interestingly, the Green Party may also pay a serious price. They once again have managed to get their fingers burnt in an affair which they should have thought out before they flip-flopped publicly. One day they vote in the Dáil supporting O’Dea….24hours later they want him gone? Did the Green’s think they were going to win major brownie points from the electorate by removing him from office? Clearly, they realized the media wanted blood and galloped along en route. The next opinion poll will be crucial for the Green’s, personally I expect a drop in support. Deirdre De Burca is unfortunately right- they are now no more then an extension of Fianna Fail. They now face the same fate as the PD’s- Oblivion.

As for the opposition, they fared as expected in the fracas. Eugene Regan of Fine Gael was the politician who originally brought the whole thing into the House. Sub-sequentially he was supported well by his party. As for Labour, they did what they always do- release a lot of hot air! As usual the party leader was all over the media (Along with Pat “the” Rabbitte) Neither party did anything overly memorable. Thankfully this affair has come to a close. The apparent end of “Willie O’Dea” has not come a day too soon! :)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.